Shortcuts
Top of page (Alt+0)
Page content (Alt+9)
Page menu (Alt+8)
Your browser does not support javascript, some WebOpac functionallity will not be available.
.
Default
.
PageMenu
-
Main Menu
-
Simple Search
.
Preferences
.
.
Member Services
.
Exit Webopac
.
LIBERO Portal Search
.
Catalogo Univ. Pontificia Salesiana
.
EbscoHost
.
Univ. Pontificia Salesiana
.
Search Menu
Simple Search
.
Advanced Search
.
Expert Search
.
Journal Search
.
Refine Search Results
.
New Items Search
.
Bottom Menu
Help
About
.
Languages
Italian
.
English
.
German
.
New Items Menu
New Items Search
.
New Items List
.
© LIBERO v6.4.1sp220816
Page content
You are here
:
Catalogue Display
Catalogue Display
Comparing paper‐based and electronic multiple‐choice examinations with personal devices : impact on students' performance, self‐efficacy and satisfaction.
.
Bookmark this Record
Catalogue Record 80097
.
Catalogue Information
Catalogue Record 80097
.
Catalogue Information
Field name
Details
Nuova numerazione
80097
Collocazione
UPS BIBL CENTR SL-II-91
Autore
NARDI, A.
Titolo
Comparing paper‐based and electronic multiple‐choice examinations with personal devices : impact on students' performance, self‐efficacy and satisfaction. Parte componente di periodico
Descrizione fisica
pp. 1495-1506.
Nota generale
Estratto da: British Journal of Educational Technology 2019, 50, 3.
Riassunto
Nowadays the size of university classes along with the growing number of students to be tested for final examination raise unprecedented challenges relating to the management, monitoring and evaluation of learning. Technology may provide some solutions that deserve to be investigated. This paper explores the potentialities and limitations of Computer‐Based Testing (CBT), specifically BYOD e‐test, compared to traditional Paper‐Based Testing (PBT) to verify whether, and to what extent, an electronic mode of assessment can become a suitable alternative to PBT. It is based on a study carried out at the University of Florence during 2016/17. 606 students participated in the study, of whom 443 opted for CBT using their own devices, while 163 preferred PBT. Participants who experienced CBT also answered a survey on perceptions, self‐efficacy and satisfaction. The results show that students' performances were better with CBT, and that a positive relationship exists between the perceived level of self‐efficacy and the propensity to adopt digital tests. In addition, students greatly appreciated the electronic system, especially for the possibility of immediate feedback. Some critical issues emerged relating to on‐screen reading, which suggests the need for careful design of testing tools.
Tipo di documento
RICERCA.
Soggetto
UNIVERSITÀ.
APPRENDIMENTO.
VALUTAZIONE.
COMPUTER.
RENDIMENTO.
TECNOLOGIA.
PERCEZIONE.
AUTOEFFICACIA.
ITALIA.
Ambito
Pedagogico
Psicologico
Autore Secondario
RANIERI, M.
Titolo correlato
British Journal of Educational Technology 2019, 50, 3.
Accesso online
Accesso diretto all'articolo
.
ISBD Display
Catalogue Record 80097
.
Tag Display
Catalogue Record 80097
.
Related Works
Catalogue Record 80097
.
Marc XML
Catalogue Record 80097
.
Add Title to Basket
Catalogue Record 80097
.
Catalogue Information 80097
Beginning of record
.
Catalogue Information 80097
Top of page
.
Download Title
Catalogue Record 80097
Export
This Record
As
Labelled Format
Bibliographic Format
ISBD Format
MARC Format
MARC Binary Format
MARCXML Format
User-Defined Format:
Collocazione
Autore Persona
Autore Ente
Autore Congresso
Titolo Uniforme
Titolo Uniforme
Titolo
Pubblicazione
Descrizione fisica
Serie - Contenuto
Contenuto in
Abstract
Parola chiave
Autore secondario Persona
To
File
Email
Quick Search
Search for