Shortcuts
Top of page (Alt+0)
Page content (Alt+9)
Page menu (Alt+8)
Your browser does not support javascript, some WebOpac functionallity will not be available.
.
Default
.
PageMenu
-
Main Menu
-
Simple Search
.
Preferences
.
.
Member Services
.
Exit Webopac
.
LIBERO Portal Search
.
Catalogo Univ. Pontificia Salesiana
.
EbscoHost
.
Univ. Pontificia Salesiana
.
Search Menu
Simple Search
.
Advanced Search
.
Expert Search
.
Journal Search
.
Refine Search Results
.
New Items Search
.
Bottom Menu
Help
About
.
Languages
Italian
.
English
.
German
.
New Items Menu
New Items Search
.
New Items List
.
© LIBERO v6.4.1sp220816
Page content
You are here
:
Catalogue Display
Catalogue Display
Examining children in English High Courts with and without implementation of reforms authorized in Section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act.
.
Bookmark this Record
Catalogue Record 79989
.
Catalogue Information
Catalogue Record 79989
.
Catalogue Information
Field name
Details
Nuova numerazione
79989
Collocazione
UPS BIBL CENTR 39-C-2578
Autore
HENDERSON, H. M.
Titolo
Examining children in English High Courts with and without implementation of reforms authorized in Section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act. Parte componente di periodico
Descrizione fisica
pp. 252-264.
Nota generale
Estratto da: “Applied Cognitive Psychology”, 2019, 33, 2.
Riassunto
This study examined whether the implementation of Section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act (1999) improved lawyers' questioning strategies when examining child witnesses in England. The government's Section 28 pilot study involved judges holding Ground Rules Hearings, during which restrictions and limitations were placed on the duration, content, and manner of questions to be asked. Afterwards, children's cross‐examinations were pre‐recorded and later played as part of their evidence at trial. The current study compared cases involving 6‐ to 15‐year‐old alleged victims of sexual abuse in which Section 28 was (n = 43) and was not (n = 44) implemented. Defence lawyers in Section 28 cases asked significantly fewer suggestive questions and more option‐posing questions than defence lawyers in Nonsection 28 cases. Younger children complied more with defence lawyers' suggestive questions. Ground Rules Hearings improved lawyers' questioning strategies, regardless of the case's involvement in the Section 28 pilot study.
Tipo di documento
RICERCA.
Soggetto
INGHILTERRA.
ADOLESCENTI.
LEGISLAZIONE.
MEMORIA.
MINORI.
GIUSTIZIA.
Ambito
Giuridico
Autore Secondario
ANDREWS, J.
LAMB, M.E.
Titolo correlato
Applied Cognitive Psychology 2019, 33, 2.
Accesso online
Accesso diretto all’articolo
.
ISBD Display
Catalogue Record 79989
.
Tag Display
Catalogue Record 79989
.
Related Works
Catalogue Record 79989
.
Marc XML
Catalogue Record 79989
.
Add Title to Basket
Catalogue Record 79989
.
Catalogue Information 79989
Beginning of record
.
Catalogue Information 79989
Top of page
.
Download Title
Catalogue Record 79989
Export
This Record
As
Labelled Format
Bibliographic Format
ISBD Format
MARC Format
MARC Binary Format
MARCXML Format
User-Defined Format:
Collocazione
Autore Persona
Autore Ente
Autore Congresso
Titolo Uniforme
Titolo Uniforme
Titolo
Pubblicazione
Descrizione fisica
Serie - Contenuto
Contenuto in
Abstract
Parola chiave
Autore secondario Persona
To
File
Email
Quick Search
Search for