Shortcuts
Top of page (Alt+0)
Page content (Alt+9)
Page menu (Alt+8)
Your browser does not support javascript, some WebOpac functionallity will not be available.
.
Default
.
PageMenu
-
Main Menu
-
Simple Search
.
Preferences
.
.
Member Services
.
Exit Webopac
.
LIBERO Portal Search
.
Catalogo Univ. Pontificia Salesiana
.
EbscoHost
.
Univ. Pontificia Salesiana
.
Search Menu
Simple Search
.
Advanced Search
.
Expert Search
.
Journal Search
.
Refine Search Results
.
New Items Search
.
Bottom Menu
Help
About
.
Languages
Italian
.
English
.
German
.
New Items Menu
New Items Search
.
New Items List
.
© LIBERO v6.4.1sp220816
Page content
You are here
:
>
Search Results
Catalogue Tag Display
Catalogue Tag Display
MARC 21
Adolescents’ explicit and implicit evaluations of hypothetical and actual peers with different bullying participant roles.
Tag
Description
001
$ 78929
013
$aUPS BIBL CENTR SL-II-587
100
$aPOUWELS, J. L.
245
$aAdolescents’ explicit and implicit evaluations of hypothetical and actual peers with different bullying participant roles.$hParte componente di periodico
300
$app. 219-241.
500
$aEstratto da: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2017, 159.
520
$aThis study examined how adolescents evaluate bullying at three levels of specificity: (a) the general concept of bullying, (b) hypothetical peers in different bullying participant roles, and (c) actual peers in different bullying participant roles. Participants were 163 predominantly ethnic majority adolescents in The Netherlands (58% girls; Mage = 16.34 years, SD = 0.79). For the hypothetical peers, we examined adolescents’ explicit evaluations as well as their implicit evaluations. Adolescents evaluated the general concept of bullying negatively. Adolescents’ explicit evaluations of hypothetical and actual peers in the bullying roles depended on their own role, but adolescents’ implicit evaluations of hypothetical peers did not. Adolescents’ explicit evaluations of hypothetical peers and actual peers were different. Hypothetical bullies were evaluated negatively by all classmates, whereas hypothetical victims were evaluated relatively positively compared with the other roles. However, when adolescents evaluated their actual classmates, the differences between bullies and the other roles were smaller, whereas victims were evaluated the most negatively of all roles. Further research should take into account that adolescents’ evaluations of hypothetical peers differ from their evaluations of actual peers.
653
$aRICERCA.
655
$aBULLISMO.
655
$aPEER-GROUP.
655
$aRUOLO.
655
$aATTEGGIAMENTI.
655
$aSCUOLA SUPERIORE.
655
$aADOLESCENTI.
655
$aPAESI BASSI.
658
$aPsicologico.
700
$aLANSU, T. A. M.
700
$aCILLESSEN, A. H. N.
740
$aJournal of Experimental Child Psychology 2017, 159.
856
$u
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2017-17857-016&lang=it&site=ehost-live
Quick Search
Search for